The question of whether political leaders should set exit timelines is a complex balancing act between transparency and effective governance. On one hand, clear departure dates can foster accountability and prevent the consolidation of power, which is particularly relevant in systems where transitions have historically been opaque. However, there is a legitimate concern that announcing an exit too early can create a lame duck period, causing the administration to lose the political capital necessary to push through difficult reforms or maintain stability. A middle ground might be to institutionalize term limits or constitutional transition frameworks, which provide predictability without stripping a leader of their immediate influence. Ultimately, the priority should be strengthening the democratic institutions that oversee transitions rather than relying solely on the personal discretion of the leader in power.