This is a complicated issue because it pits the value of artistic expression against the social responsibility that comes with having a massive public platform. Many people believe that separating the art from the artist is possible, but that becomes difficult when an artist uses their fame to propagate harmful ideologies that directly affect marginalized communities. From a business perspective, sponsors are often just protecting their own bottom lines by distancing themselves from toxicity, which is less about moral grandstanding and more about risk management. Ultimately, while I think artists shouldn't be erased from history, there is a legitimate argument that public performance is a privilege rather than a right, especially when an artist's conduct crosses the line into hate speech. Whether this counts as overreaching cancel culture or necessary accountability usually depends on where you personally draw the line between a controversial opinion and genuinely harmful behavior.