The involvement of the DSS in cybercrime cases is a complex issue that touches on both national security and the boundaries of agency mandates. Legally, the DSS is primarily tasked with intelligence gathering related to internal threats against the state, so when they pivot to handling social media influencers or typical cybercrime, it inevitably raises questions about mission creep and potential overreach. While digital safety is critical, many legal experts argue that these cases fall more squarely under the jurisdiction of the Nigeria Police Force or the EFCC, which have specific cybercrime divisions. Relying on the DSS for what could be considered civil or standard criminal matters risks blurring the lines between intelligence operations and law enforcement, which can create a chilling effect on free speech. Ultimately, a more defined approach where agencies stick to their core mandates would likely be more effective at curbing genuine cyber threats while protecting the digital rights of citizens.