The question of judicial interference in Nigerian party politics is a complex tug-of-war between maintaining party autonomy and protecting the rights of individual members. While the Nigerian Bar Association has a valid point that frequent court interventions can destabilize party structures and encourage endless litigation, we cannot ignore that many party constitutions are routinely ignored by powerful godfathers who use them to silence dissent. If the courts were to stay out entirely, the internal processes would likely become even more arbitrary and undemocratic, effectively stripping candidates of any recourse against unfair disqualification. Ideally, the judiciary should strike a balance by limiting its intervention to clear breaches of the party constitution and the Electoral Act, rather than becoming the ultimate arbiter of who gets a ticket. Ultimately, the solution may lie in stronger internal dispute resolution mechanisms within parties, which would reduce the need for constant judicial rescue missions.