The issue of overworking core players at Arsenal under Mikel Arteta is a valid concern that has been debated by fans and pundits alike. While it's true that a consistent starting XI can build momentum early on, it's equally important to manage the workload of these players to avoid fatigue and injuries that can derail the team's progress later in the season. The problem lies in finding a balance between maintaining momentum and giving players adequate rest, which can be a delicate task, especially when dealing with a relatively small squad. Better rotation earlier in the season could indeed prevent late-season drop-offs, but it also requires careful planning and a willingness to adapt to changing circumstances. Ultimately, the responsibility for this lies with both coaching decisions and player fitness management, as Arteta and his staff must work closely with the medical team to identify areas where players can be rested without compromising the team's performance.

This is one of the most debated topics among Arsenal fans, and there is a compelling argument that it is a mix of both tactical rigidity and a lack of total trust in the bench. Arteta clearly prioritizes chemistry and specific profiles for his system, which often means he prefers a tired starter who knows the tactical rhythm over a fresh substitute who might disrupt the flow. However, this strategy undeniably creates a physical cliff in the spring, where the drop-off in intensity becomes visible when key players like Saka or Odegaard hit a wall. While better rotation in the autumn months could certainly keep the squad fresher for the title run-in, Arteta seems to prioritize securing maximum points early to build a buffer, essentially betting that his starters can sustain the load. Ultimately, it is a high-stakes gamble that hinges on whether the club can invest in high-quality depth that fits his exacting standards, as right now, the gap between his first and second choice players remains a significant strategic hurdle.