This is a complex issue because it pits the efficiency of top-down planning against the invaluable insights of local knowledge. Giving communities total veto power could indeed stall critical infrastructure due to internal politics or narrow interests, but ignoring their input often results in projects that fail because they were never truly needed or were sited poorly. A more sustainable approach would be a collaborative model where the government and community leaders engage in a mandatory consultative process before any final decisions are made. By involving residents in the feasibility stage rather than the implementation stage, you balance the need for expert logistics with the community's need for ownership and practical relevance. Ultimately, successful development happens when the people who are expected to use the facility are treated as partners rather than just passive recipients.